The Supreme Court is set to hear arguments on Tuesday regarding the potential invalidation of an obstruction law that was used against a significant number of defendants charged in the Capitol attack on Jan. 6, 2021.
The result could potentially benefit Donald Trump, who is currently facing charges associated with his attempts to overturn the 2020 election. Moreover, it could also have far-reaching implications for the individuals involved in the January 6th riot, particularly those charged with obstruction, as this charge carries the possibility of adding up to 20 years to their prison terms.
Joseph Fischer, a former police officer who was charged in the riot, argues that the law was approved by Congress in 2002 after the Enron scandal to specifically address document shredding. Fischer maintains that he did not engage in any document shredding at the Capitol.
Government lawyers argue that the law is comprehensive enough to encompass various scenarios, including the disruption of official meetings like Congress tallying Electoral College votes.
The decision of the high court could have far-reaching implications as it pertains to over a quarter of the individuals involved in the events of January 6, including none other than former President Trump.
A number of prisoners have been granted release while waiting for their appeals to be reviewed, as the justices have the authority to overturn the way the law has been implemented thus far.
Justice Department special council Jack Smith has contended that even if the law is invalidated for rioters, it could still be applicable to Trump based on other actions he took prior to January 6th.
The high court is not bound by any deadline to resolve the dispute, but it is anticipated that a decision will be reached by the end of June.
